Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason(at)tishler(dot)net]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 20:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Thomas Lockhart;
> Tom Lane; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms
>
>
> Dave,
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:20:16AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >
> > My WAG is that you will be able to upgrade your Cygwin installation
> > before I fix the Cygwin build issues. :,)
>
> I guess my WAG was wrong... :,)

I've been meaning to ask this for a while - what exactly is a WAG? :-)

> 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e.,
> 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y
> successfully. I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking
> the maintainer for this upgrade.

OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from
CVS.

> 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:
>
> #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
> #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
> #define ftello(a) ftell((a))
> #endif
>
> conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:
>
> int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
> off_t _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve
> this one yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Yes, I'm seeing errors with this on my updated Cygwin very early in the
build. I did think it was my hacked about installation, but I guess not!

Unfortunately though, I don't know the answer either, but I guess the
change was in Cygwin as I didn't see it before you asked me to upgrade.

Regards, Dave.