Re: gforge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 26 November 2003 14:02
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] gforge
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > What's wrong with Gborg, or have I missed the point?
>
> I think the big thing is stall'd development and lack of
> features ... at least that is the feel I've ever gotten from
> ppl when I try to get them turned onto it ;(

On the plus side we have various developments in there that *we* want
that we might not get in another package.

A few thoughts:

- What are you going to do about existing projects? Force them to move
or end up with 2 projeect sites. Bear in mind that some of the more
important ones (libpqxx, npgsql etc.) may not want to move.

- Are we going to advertise both on the main site? Seems like it would
be pretty confusing to me.

- gforge.postgresql.org/gborg.postgresql.org are confusingly similar.

- If ppl move site, then there will be potentially massive migration of
user lists to handle.

Regards, Dave.