Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 23:23
> To: Adam H. Pendleton
> Cc: jm(at)poure(dot)com; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies
>
> Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
>
> >>So are we going to be using the official wxWindows RPMs
> from now on?
> >>Are we going to run into any problems since we currently
> use a build
> >>of wxWindows that differs from the "official" build?
> >>
> >>
> Still absolutely no, there's not a haze of work in committing
> my patches, not even commenting on it.

Are you going to bother submitting more now they will probably reject
them out of hand anyway?

(For those that don't know, the wx team want all patch submitters to
sign over copyright etc. on their code - this is at request of Borland).

Regards, Dave.