Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
Date: 2002-09-11 14:21:43
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B867E6@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Ahh, I remember that. It was a short-lived attempt to fork the code and
bring the driver to ODBC3 before Hiroshi took over from Byron as the
lead on psqlODBC.

This is *not* the official driver.

Regards, Dave.

-----Original Message-----
From: Henshall, Stuart - WCP
[mailto:SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk]
Sent: 11 September 2002 15:10
To: Dave Page; Michael Meskes
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question

Hi,
I believe Micheal may be talking about ODBC+
see:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbcplus/projdisplay.php

That has a SQLProcedureColumns.c

http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbcplus/cvs/cvs.php/psqlodbcplu
s/SQLProcedureColumns.c?Horde=f23137a159515eaf6dd2fff7a7285a7c

Cheers,
- Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 15:09
> To: Michael Meskes
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> > Sent: 11 September 2002 14:55
> > To: Dave Page
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > No, I hadn't actually checked that, I was just trying to
> > explain the
> > > existance of the 3 drivers.
> >
> > I see.
> >
> > > SQLProcedureColumns is currently not implemented in any
> > version of the
> > > driver I'm afraid. The 'place holder' implementation can
> be found in
> >
> > Somehow I do not completely understand that. There's a file
> > named SQLProcedureColumns.c in ODBC+ that defines a function

> > named SQLProcedureColumns. Isn't that the correct function?
> > Or what's missing?
>
> There is no file called SQLProcedureColumns.c (see:
>
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc/cvs/cvs.php/psqlodbc).
>
> In info.c, the function SQLProcedureColumns is defined, and
> is exported
> in the .def files. This function calls PGAPI_ProcedureColumns
(the
> function that should do the actual work) which merely returns
a 'not
> implemented' message.
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-09-11 14:26:20 Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-09-11 14:08:48 Re: [HACKERS] ODBC problem/question