| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgAggregate problem any function |
| Date: | 2003-09-09 11:21:32 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B5C1@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 09 September 2003 12:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Hiroshi Saito; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAggregate problem any function
>
>
> Didn't want to check all keywords, but there are some treated special,
> and one of them is "char". I was wondering if "any" will make problems
> in other places too, that's why I'd like to see it in qtIdent().
I guess we should really check them all. Can we jsut lift the relevant
bits of
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/backend/pars
er/keywords.c?rev=1.141&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup, or would you
prefer it was done a different way?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-09 12:37:18 | Re: Build System/translations |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-09-09 11:15:47 | Re: pgAggregate problem any function |