Re: Debian Packaging

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Debian Packaging
Date: 2003-06-23 07:35:28
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B107@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 23 June 2003 02:13
> To: jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr
> Cc: Dave Page; blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr;
> pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Debian Packaging
>
>
> You might check out vserver instead of UML, it has plenty of advantes
> (including my endorsement!):
>
> http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc

Hi Adam,

It looks good, but from a quick glance through the docs it looks like
all the VMs run the same distro as the host machine kinda like FreeBSD
jails. With UML, we can run instances of any distro at once and they're
all isolated.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-06-23 07:52:50 Re: Debian Packaging
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-06-23 07:24:45 Re: PostgreSQL service manager