From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Packaging policy |
Date: | 2003-06-11 10:28:26 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B03B@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page
> Sent: 11 June 2003 11:21
> To: jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Packaging policy
>
>
>
> No, I don't use Debian, and never have.
>
> What about FreeBSD, Mac OS-X & Solaris? They are probably the
> other main unixes we should target. I did have FreeBSD on CD,
> and Solaris 7(?), but that's x86. No Sparcs around here unfortunately.
>
> I do think that we should get the build sorted first as well
> though. Having looked at what's coming out of snake, I think
> it's (now) half dynamic and half static. The wx parts are
> static, but libpq, glibc etc. are dynamic.
Ooops, forgot Windows. I can package that using Wise, but how do we get
the language support in there?
Also, we need to sort out the docs. I don't think having the docs on the
net is such a good idea. We can include the latest PostgreSQL docs in
the tarball, as well as our own stuff, all in HTML format. What do you
think?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-06-11 10:38:50 | pgAdmin3 documentation |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-06-11 10:21:23 | Re: Packaging policy |