| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PQfnumber and quoted identifiers |
| Date: | 2003-10-05 20:35:13 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF280@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 05 October 2003 20:41
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; PostgreSQL Development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PQfnumber and quoted identifiers
>
>
> Strange no one complained about it until now. I suppose that
> is because few folks use that function _and_ upper-case
> identifiers, as you mentioned. We could code the proper
> behavior, post a mention on general, and document it in the
> release notes, or wait for 7.5, or do nothing.
Can it wait for 7.5 (and some method of checking the libpq versions such
as Tom's PQparameterStatus() suggestion) please? We already released
pgAdmin III taking into account this behaviour in 7.4 and a change now
would not be so good for us.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-05 20:38:41 | Re: PQfnumber and quoted identifiers |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-10-05 20:31:33 | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |