From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pgadmin III and wxWindows |
Date: | 2003-05-08 07:14:15 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF078@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 07 May 2003 19:36
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Pgadmin III and wxWindows
>
>
> While I am waiting for my UNIX system to be re-built so I can start
> working on the autoconf work, I decided I would compile and run the
> current cvs version of Pgadmin III. I had no problem getting
> pg3, not
> did I have any problem getting the latest version of wxWindows and
> compiling that, the question I have is what is the easist way to link
> them together? Should I be linking against wxWindows as a
> DLL, or as a
> static library? What is the preferred method for doing this?
Hi Adam,
The current makefile does a static link as you probably saw, and at the
moment thats the way I'm leaning for binary distributions as well as it
should make things easier both from a getting it to work perspective,
and tracking down odd bugs caused by builds on slightly different
systems.
It would be nice to eventually allow both build types though - I assume
autoconf can do that? (I guess it can 'cos wxWindows can be built either
way...).
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-05-08 07:39:29 | Re: pgAdmin III |
Previous Message | Michael Brusser | 2003-05-07 19:44:40 | could not read transaction log directory |