Re: Pgadmin III and wxWindows

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgadmin III and wxWindows
Date: 2003-05-08 07:14:15
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF078@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 07 May 2003 19:36
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Pgadmin III and wxWindows
>
>
> While I am waiting for my UNIX system to be re-built so I can start
> working on the autoconf work, I decided I would compile and run the
> current cvs version of Pgadmin III. I had no problem getting
> pg3, not
> did I have any problem getting the latest version of wxWindows and
> compiling that, the question I have is what is the easist way to link
> them together? Should I be linking against wxWindows as a
> DLL, or as a
> static library? What is the preferred method for doing this?

Hi Adam,

The current makefile does a static link as you probably saw, and at the
moment thats the way I'm leaning for binary distributions as well as it
should make things easier both from a getting it to work perspective,
and tracking down odd bugs caused by builds on slightly different
systems.

It would be nice to eventually allow both build types though - I assume
autoconf can do that? (I guess it can 'cos wxWindows can be built either
way...).

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-05-08 07:39:29 Re: pgAdmin III
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-05-07 19:44:40 could not read transaction log directory