| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: View definition formatting |
| Date: | 2003-04-02 09:56:30 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259ECA@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 01 April 2003 20:59
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Dave Page; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] View definition formatting
>
>
> We could make variants of pg_get_ruledef etc. that
> pretty-print, while leaving the existing behavior alone, I suppose.
>
Hacking those functions never crossed my mind, but it would certainly do
what I require, and is probably more within the scope of things I could
do myself. *If* I get time and can figure it out, how would people feel
about pg_get_pp_viewdef(oid) etc?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2003-04-02 10:29:09 | Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-04-02 01:32:19 | Re: View definition formatting |