| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Date: | 2002-10-19 19:36:35 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128B08@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 19 October 2002 17:17
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] /contrib/retep to gborg
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am concerned that removing them may cause instability,
> particularly
> > in some of the java build scripts. That's why I am suggesting not
> > doing it during beta.
>
> Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC
> driver. As long as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we
> should leave contrib/retep there too.
>
> There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure
> what the plan is, if any.
Marc asked me to sort it along with some other things, but when I spoke
to Barry he didn't want to move. I passed it back to Marc.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-20 02:17:17 | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-10-19 18:14:56 | Re: [HACKERS] clusterdb has poor error recovery |