| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
| Date: | 2010-11-04 20:28:37 |
| Message-ID: | 03ADD7F8-64F0-4C37-B7DE-B88A5F28438A@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 4, 2010, at 4:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-11-03 at 14:15 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> /me wants a global $dbh that mimics the DBI interface but just uses
>> SPI under the hood. Not volunteering, either…
>
> Already exists: DBD::PgSPI. Probably needs lots of updating through.
Funny I never noticed that before. I couldn't get it to build, of course. And it looks a bit heavy, relying on DBD::Pg. Seems like it'd be easier to write something that just uses SPI and emulates the DBI interface, IMHO.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-11-04 20:29:49 | Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-04 20:15:58 | Re: lazy snapshots? |