Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com" <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
Date: 2019-03-12 20:24:01
Message-ID: 03845f77-49e7-4569-7062-8ee1fb460ec2@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thanks Kirk !

On 3/12/19 2:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> The words 'by default' should be removed here, because there is also
> no non-default way to get that behavior, either.
>

Here is v9 based on Kirk's and your input.

Best regards,
Jesper

Attachment Content-Type Size
v9_0001-Highlight-that-the-jobs-option-isn-t-passed-down-to-.patch text/x-patch 3.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-03-12 20:27:47 Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-03-12 20:19:08 Re: Suggestions on message transfer among backends