Re: VACUUM not doing its job?

> In my case, it was the fact that indexes don't release the space of
> indexes of deleted rows. So, if you have a table that has a lot of
> inserts/deletes, your indexes will grow incredibly fast.
>
> The way to see what your biggest items are:
> select * from pg_class order by relpages desc;

Yes, I already suspected this could be at least part of the reason, and your
SQL query confirms it. However, dropping and re-creating my biggest indexes
only reclaims about 500MB, this still leaves about 1GB unaccounted for and I
can't see how my remaining (small) indexes can be responsible for this (btw:
do you know how much diskspace one 'relpage' use?).

Given that I have lots of deletes/inserts, is there anything besides the
indexes which could use this much space?

> The only way that I know to recover this space is to drop the indexes
> and recreate them. Vacuum didn't touch them for me.

This is not good as the database is in use 24/7, and without the indexes
everything comes to a screeching halt. This means I probably will have to
stop the programs using the database for the time it takes to re-create the
indexes; this is better than having to dump/restore everything however :)

Are there any plans to also vacuum the indexes in a future version of
Postgre (otherwise an excellent piece of software!) ?

Regards,

Kristian