Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index
Date: 2021-03-10 16:48:05
Message-ID: 035e6322-a16c-6614-bb5f-4efa1aef05e6@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/4/20 12:31 PM, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> The cfbot's still unhappy --- looks like you omitted a file from the
> patch?
>
> You are right, thank you. Corrected this. PFA v13

Tom, do the changes as enumerated in [1] look like they are going in the
right direction?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALT9ZEEszJUwsXMWknXQ3k_YbGtQaQwiYxxEGZ-pFGRUDSXdtQ%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2021-03-10 16:48:21 Re: WIP: document the hook system
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-03-10 16:10:02 Re: pg_amcheck contrib application