| From: | "Jonathan Gonzalez V(dot)" <jonathan(dot)abdiel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: splitting pg_resetwal output strings |
| Date: | 2026-05-24 10:10:05 |
| Message-ID: | 0357cb9cd9a362662d5d1eb2eb8ef4db1ba18f01.camel@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
On a second round a notice these two strings:
+ char *str = "First log segment after reset";
+ thislen = internal_wcswidth(_(str), strlen(_(str)),
encoding);
+ if (thislen > maxlen)
and
+ char *str = "First log segment after reset";
+ thislen = internal_wcswidth(_(str), strlen(_(str)),
encoding);
+ if (thislen > maxlen)
Are never catch by the `make update-po` command, instead, the strings
are there in the `.po.new` file commented.
Should we put them between `_()`? or is expected that it's being catch
by the second line with the `_()` ?
--
Jonathan Gonzalez V.
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2026-05-24 11:29:28 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-05-24 09:50:00 | Re: RFC: Allow EXPLAIN to Output Page Fault Information |