Re: [bug fix] Suppress "autovacuum: found orphan temp table" message

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Suppress "autovacuum: found orphan temp table" message
Date: 2014-07-22 10:13:56
Message-ID: 03494F091383441E9F75E4BFA79AF168@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> On 2014-07-22 17:05:22 +0900, MauMau wrote:
>> RemovePgTempFiles() frees the disk space by removing temp relation files
>> at
>> server start.
>
> But it's not called during a crash restart.

Yes, the comment of the function says:

* NOTE: we could, but don't, call this during a post-backend-crash restart
* cycle. The argument for not doing it is that someone might want to
examine
* the temp files for debugging purposes. This does however mean that
* OpenTemporaryFile had better allow for collision with an existing temp
* file name.

But this is true if restart_after_crash = on in postgresql.conf, because the
crash restart only occurs in that case. However, in HA cluster, whether it
is shared-disk or replication, restart_after_crash is set to off, isn't it?

Moreover, as the comment says, the behavior of keeping leftover temp files
is for debugging by developers. It's not helpful for users, isn't it? I
thought messages of DEBUG level is more appropriate, because the behavior is
for debugging purposes.

>> In addition, the temp relation files are not replicated to
>> the standby server of streaming replication (this is the customer's
>> case).
>
> So?

Yes, so nobody can convince serious customers that the current behavior
makes real sense.

Could you please reconsider this?

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-22 10:23:59 Re: [bug fix] Suppress "autovacuum: found orphan temp table" message
Previous Message 土卜皿 2014-07-22 10:13:13 Re: how to reach D5 in tuplesort.c 's polyphase merge algorithm?