Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed

On 3/4/20 5:36 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:06 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 3/6/18 9:25 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:24:24PM +0300, Ivan Kartyshov wrote:
>>>> Hello, I now is preparing the patch over syntax that Simon offered. And in
>>>> few day I will update the patch.
>>>> Thank you for your interest in thread.
>>>
>>> It has been more than one month since a patch update has been requested,
>>> and time is growing short. This refactored patch introduces a whole new
>>> concept as well, so my recommendation would be to mark this patch as
>>> returned with feedback, and then review it freshly for v12 if this
>>> concept is still alive and around.
>>
>> This patch wasn't updated at the beginning of the CF and still hasn't
>> been updated after almost two weeks.
>>
>> I have marked the patch Returned with Feedback. Please resubmit to a
>> new CF when you have an updated patch.
>
> There are no updates from about two years before, but this patch
> has been registered in CF 2020-03. Not sure why. It should be marked
> as Returned with Feedback again?

Worse, it was marked Needs Review even though no new patch was provided.

I'm going to set this back to Returned with Feedback. If anyone has a
good reason that it should be in the CF we can always revive it.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net