Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Date: 2016-11-11 14:03:55
Message-ID: 032ab91d-54e8-d060-30cc-ebdc60917a83@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 11/9/16 10:05 AM, Mithun Cy wrote:
> As in Victor's patch we have a new connection parameter
> "target_server_type", It can take 2 values 1. "any" 2. "master" with
> DEFAULT as "any". If it's has the value "any" we can connect to any of
> the host server (both master(primary) and slave(standby)). If the value
> is "master" then we try to connect to master(primary) only.

We tend to use the term "primary" instead of "master".

Will this work with logical replication?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-11-11 14:45:20 Re: Improving RLS planning
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2016-11-11 14:03:52 Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-11-14 02:02:07 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-11-11 07:03:49 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.