| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option? |
| Date: | 2019-06-05 20:31:54 |
| Message-ID: | 031dc90a-0d2c-69f3-b219-88197a6968f2@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-05-28 04:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You could also use a long option for that without a one-letter option,
> like --file-path or such, so reserving a one-letter option for a
> future, hypothetical use is not really a stopper in my opinion. In
> consequence, I think that that it is fine to just use -f/--filenode.
> Any objections or better suggestions from other folks here?
I think -r/--relfilenode was actually a good suggestion. Because it
doesn't actually check a *file* but potentially several files (forks,
segments). The -f naming makes it sound like it operates on a specific
file.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-06-05 20:54:24 | Re: Cleaning up and speeding up string functions |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2019-06-05 20:31:37 | Re: Add CREATE DATABASE LOCALE option |