Re: Continuing instability in insert-conflict-specconflict test

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Continuing instability in insert-conflict-specconflict test
Date: 2020-08-25 17:03:37
Message-ID: 02cbfbbb-96d7-e76c-0f52-5f9735ef3a23@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 8/24/20 4:42 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> This test is really hairy, which isn't great. But until we have a proper
> framework for controlling server side execution, I am not sure how we
> better can achieve test coverage for this stuff. And there've been bugs,
> so it's worth testing.
>

What would the framework look like?

cheers

andrew

--

Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2020-08-25 17:13:42 Out-of-bounds access (ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON) (src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtdedup.c)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-08-25 16:59:31 Re: some unused parameters cleanup