From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2003-10-01 18:34:58 |
Message-ID: | 02a701c3884a$b7a6df70$1f324d80@w2k |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
> Hiroshi Saito wrote:
(snip)
> >It isn't understood.
> >Shouldn't put it in SQL_ASCII.
> >Database comes to return the result which made a mistake.
> >Or, do you use 256(2^8=256) ASCII?
> >
>
> The DB will store 8 bit per character, regardless of the db encoding.
> When it comes to conversion, only 7 bits are valid, if you tell the
> backend "this is ASCII data". Your fault, if it actually isn't.
However,
WHERE of SELECT will go to look for it with 7bit for ENCODING if to be SQL_ASCII.
Then, it fails.
And, order by, too.
Therefore, it is the case which you must not use.
regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-01 18:37:39 | Re: utffile.cpp & expatd.lib |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-10-01 18:32:20 | Re: |