Re: New wx patch

Hi Andreas.

setup0.h isn't contained though "wx-20031026.patch" of the accumulation.
you think that it was particularly excluded.
Write it in readme-patches.txt.
Because I was stupid, I did Make-Test again.:-(
Does the thing which contains it become wxWindows-pgAdmin3-20031010-6.tar.bz2?

And ID of the doubt?(828538->828537)
---readme-patches.txt-----
...
wx-20031026.patch
=================
...
all 828538 Wrong size calculation in wxCalendarCtrl

Is it 828538?
So, I am not found.

regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>

> Hi Dave,
>
> I nailed down and fixed another clipboard bug. Actually, it's the same
> problem we had with gtk, so I extended an existing patch.
> I uploaded a cumulative patch to snake, but for compiling a new wx
> snapshot you'd probable be better off if you apply the attached patch
> separately. Since three files in the current snapshot are already
> patched, the re-patch probably fails. Just get a fresh copy from wx cvs,
> or I could mail you the files if you like that better.
>
> For gtk, nightly builds do *not* need this additional patch, because the
> new patch is just a reimplementation; this change affects only msw.