| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>,"pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
| Date: | 2018-07-16 18:41:51 |
| Message-ID: | 026AD6A1-3396-47F4-B87E-77E3F139D166@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16 July 2018 21:38:39 EEST, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
>wrote:
>> Doesn't have to be a trigger, could be a CHECK constraint, datatype
>input
>> function, etc. Admittedly, having a datatype input function that
>inserts to
>> the table is worth a "huh?", but I'm feeling very confident that we
>can
>> catch all such cases, and some of them might even be sensible.
>
>Is this sentence missing a "not"? i.e. "I'm not feeling very
>confident"?
Yes, sorry.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Klychkov | 2018-07-16 18:58:06 | Alter index rename concurrently to |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-16 18:38:39 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |