| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL cluster solution |
| Date: | 2009-12-23 18:02:16 |
| Message-ID: | 025b05698f44c54f204eaeac2af3e0f7@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> I want a multi-master solution since that would
> best spread the write load.
...
> What I want
> Mutli master
Might also look at Bucardo
> Failover and failback (if that makes sense for a multimaster solution...)
No, not really. :(
> Synchronize after downtime
Everything should do that.
> Load-balancing
> Once a client is connected it stays connected to that server (possibly
> through LVS)
That's generally handled by something else.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200912231301
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAksyWw8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsheYQCgyxG5U/xzFzzUmaNVAEF5hb7q
fp4AoP6YSfACBCdVQziw9MKKfJGTLTvj
=BeBe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sfarley1 | 2009-12-25 17:42:56 | PostgreSQL 8.3 and Windows 7 |
| Previous Message | Pushpendra Singh Thakur | 2009-12-23 14:31:38 | Re: PostgreSQL cluster solution |