Re: BUG #16085: Potential missing version information available for /usr/pgsql-12/lib/libpq.so.5

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, git(at)jjerphan(dot)xyz, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16085: Potential missing version information available for /usr/pgsql-12/lib/libpq.so.5
Date: 2019-11-06 15:12:14
Message-ID: 01ec246e78bb4eb2758a5f56aa61af4050f7c7a9.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


Hi,

On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 09:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Devrim, can you comment on this? I am confused by this report.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<snip>
```
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/vtk/libvtkIOPostgreSQL.so.1: undefined reference to
> > `PQfname(at)RHPG_9(dot)6'

You are building this software against Fedora/Red Hat's PostgreSQL, which ships
these weird symbols (note the RHPG_9.6), and then you are trying to expect it
to work against community PostgreSQL.

Either use their PostgreSQL (which happens when you remove ours), or remove
them,install PGDG RPMs, and recompile against ours.

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-11-06 15:28:28 BUG #16097: ts_headline fails on text with html style tag
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-11-06 14:07:30 Re: BUG #16085: Potential missing version information available for /usr/pgsql-12/lib/libpq.so.5