| From: | "Peter" <peter(at)greatnowhere(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Kris Jurka'" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC problem with dates and ANYELEMENT type |
| Date: | 2009-04-24 08:44:30 |
| Message-ID: | 01e001c9c4b8$e28c93a0$a7a5bae0$@com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
>> Any suggestions how to work around this so we can still use ANYELEMENT
>> and pass in DATE?
> You can put a cast into the query itself "SELECT ?::date".
Nah... that's no good. The same query string is used for many different types in my app - such approach would require me to parse the SQL string and append cast to date when argument is java.sql.Date. I'll leave this as last-ditch approach.
What are the potential implications if I patch setDate() method in AbstractJdbc2Statement to pass OID.Date instead of 'unspecified'? Would that break anything else? We don’t use timestamps anywhere in the app yet, so I'm not really worried about timezone being potentially screwed up.
Peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Lister | 2009-04-24 09:05:23 | Re: JDBC problem with dates and ANYELEMENT type |
| Previous Message | Jeppe Sommer | 2009-04-24 08:19:34 | Re: Here's a fix to AbstractJdbc3Statement.getGeneratedKeys |