| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hacker mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files |
| Date: | 2015-10-14 17:50:27 |
| Message-ID: | 01C9E007-56C3-4C48-997A-9C7493A41E27@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On October 14, 2015 7:45:53 PM GMT+02:00, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>Amir Rohan wrote:
>
>> it does fail the "dependent options" test:
>> $ postgres -C "archive_mode"
>> on
>> $ postgres -C wal_level
>> minimal
>>
>> no errors, great, let's try it:
>> $ pg_ctl restart
>>
>> FATAL: WAL archival cannot be enabled when wal_level is "minimal"
>
>This complaint could be fixed we had a --check-config that runs the
>check hook for every variable, I think.
The problem is that this, and some others, invariant is checked outside the GUC framework. Which we should probably change, which IIRC will require some new infrastructure.
Andres
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2015-10-14 17:52:36 | Re: Allow ssl_renegotiation_limit in PG 9.5 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-10-14 17:45:53 | Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files |