RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

From: Nicolas Huillard <nhuillard(at)ghs(dot)fr>
To: "pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>, "pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date: 2000-01-28 22:31:34
Message-ID: 01BF69E7.D17FF8D0@agen.int.ghs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

A little adjustment : SOME queries work with the new binary and the old indexes. Many other don't, as Tom and Hiroshi figured.
With a new binary and after reloding the DB, every seems to work correctly.

Nicolas Huillard

-----Message d'origine-----
De: Nicolas Huillard [SMTP:nhuillard(at)ghs(dot)fr]
Date: vendredi 28 janvier 2000 22:42
À: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org; pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Objet: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Thank to everybody, I recompiled Postgres and tested it on the same DB : the offending SELECT worked, without any index regeneration. Maybe the order in which the items where inserted in the table (using COPY, before creating the index) made it working.
...

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graeme Merrall 2000-01-29 00:09:38 Quick function question
Previous Message Nicolas Huillard 2000-01-28 21:41:43 RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roland Roberts 2000-01-29 04:22:54 Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys
Previous Message Nicolas Huillard 2000-01-28 21:41:43 RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4