Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date: 2016-11-30 14:43:49
Message-ID: 019edd7b-0321-8dd6-af31-df86cf1cd5d1@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/7/16 12:43 AM, amul sul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> The third paragraph may be redundant, I'm a bit inclined to leave it for kindness and completeness. The attached revised patch just correct the existing typo (large -> larger).
>>
>
> I am not agree to having this paragraph either, I'll leave the
> decision to committer.
>
>> I'll change the status to needs review.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-30 14:52:32 Re: Mail thread references in commits
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-30 13:53:03 Re: patch: function xmltable