Re: Possible bug on insert

From: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug on insert
Date: 2003-10-06 19:55:38
Message-ID: 019b01c38c43$d15c9930$0700a8c0@trogdor
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

What was it that changed in 7.3 that made this behavior change. (it worked
in 7.2)

Thanks,

Rick Gigger

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible bug on insert

> "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> writes:
> > insert into bugtest (a) select '1' union select '1'; -- this one fails
>
> > Is this a bug?
>
> No. It's unfortunate perhaps, but it's not a bug. The UNION forces us
> to make a decision about the output datatype of the UNION operation.
> In your other cases the chosen datatype is integer, which can later be
> cast to smallint for the insert, but in this case the chosen datatype is
> text, which is not implicitly castable to smallint.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2003-10-06 20:00:06 Re: Possible bug on insert
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-06 19:29:49 Re: pg_restore takes ages