Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
Date: 2017-11-28 16:34:24
Message-ID: 017ce76f-adcc-986a-e09f-127373f011b4@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/28/17 10:34, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Is ERRCODE_INVALID_FUNCTION_DEFINITION still appropriate?

Well, maybe not, but changing that is likely more trouble than it's worth.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-11-28 16:51:28 copy.c allocation constant
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-28 16:32:28 Re: scan-build plpython stuff