Re: Arrays

From: Bob Pawley <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>
To: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Arrays
Date: 2006-01-26 21:02:16
Message-ID: 017401c622bb$c9f149a0$ac1d4318@owner
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The order for the array is Min, Norm, Max, Unit.

I'll probably reorder it with the unit first as every value has a unit.

Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>; "Stephan Szabo"
<sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>; "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>; "Postgresql"
<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Arrays

> Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
>> Bob Pawley wrote:
>>
>>> ERROR: malformed array literal: "{100, 250, 500, DegF)"
>>
>>
>> Well you have a typo:
>>
>> "{100, 250, 500, DegF)" is wrong...
>>
>> "{100, 250, 500, DegF}" is correct...
>>
> I'd say both are wrong ;)
> '{100,250,500,DegF}' could work. But I'm not sure about that
> DegF. Since array members are all of the same type - is degf
> some integer constant?
>
> Regards
> Tino
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

In response to

  • Re: Arrays at 2006-01-26 20:30:42 from Tino Wildenhain

Responses

  • Re: Arrays at 2006-01-26 21:09:34 from Tino Wildenhain

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2006-01-26 21:09:34 Re: Arrays
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-01-26 20:44:30 Re: VACUUM Question