| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
| Date: | 2011-02-09 18:09:40 |
| Message-ID: | 016D61EA-76A0-4699-BA39-66DC284182DB@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> There are certainly some patches in this CommitFest that need more
> attention than that, and that probably need the attention of a senior
> community member. Jeff's range types patch and Alvaro's key lock
> patch are two of those. And I would be willing to do that, except
> that I'm already listed as a reviewer for FOURTEEN PATCHES this
> CommitFest, plus I committed some others that someone else reviewed
> and am also functioning as CommitFest manager. The problem isn't so
> much the amount of calendar time that's required to get through 100
> patches as the many people either submit half-baked code and assume
> that they or someone else will fix it later, or else they submit code
> but don't do an amount of review work equal to the amount of review
> work they generate.
Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some other folks to take on more.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-02-09 18:19:59 | Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-09 17:45:35 | Re: exposing COPY API |