From: | "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connecting remotely. |
Date: | 2000-11-01 16:40:18 |
Message-ID: | 016401c04422$6b8db600$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
What's the difference between having the client use ADO to talk to the
database as opposed to an interface using the postgresql client libraries?
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio A. Kessler" <sak(at)tribctas(dot)gba(dot)gov(dot)ar>
To: <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>; <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely.
> "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> el día Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:52:35
> -0500, escribió:
>
> [...]
> >
> >What are people's thoughts?
>
> people's thoughts are that you really want to design a multi-thier
> design (for example a 3 layer design), where
>
> / client1 (browser)
> database <---> bussines rules - client2 (browser)
> (ie. apache, php,...) \ .....
>
>
> if your client has direct access to the database, you design is broken...
>
> sergio
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | matthew denner | 2000-11-01 16:45:39 | does the 7.0.2 JDBC driver support absolute() |
Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-11-01 16:37:34 | Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc |