From: | "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Connecting remotely. |
Date: | 2000-11-01 16:36:00 |
Message-ID: | 014601c04421$d20c39c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Well, I was mostly feeling out ideas... mainly because I don't know how to
write com objects or an OLE DB provider. :P
The 6th through the 10th I have a training course for VB and it gets into
Active X DLLs and Com objects, so naturally I was thinking of what I would
use my new found power for and I thought of that as a possibility.
As for the ole db... does anyone have an idea where to start looking for
that info? Would it have to be written in C? I found a company that sells
software that creates ole dbs...
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Adam Lang'" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>;
<pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com]
> > Sent: 01 November 2000 14:53
> > Cc: pgsql-interfaces
> > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely.
> >
> >
> > That's what I was figuring... so... is it possible to take
> > those files,
> > compile them into a dll and make a postgresql-specific remote
> > connection
> > library? So, say instead of referencing ADO in Visual Basic
> > and using the
> > ODBC driver, merely wrap up necessary functionality of the client side
> > libraries? Would that be hard? (Never made a DLL before, so unsure).
>
> Many before you have tried this and failed miserably!! :-)
>
> Seriously though, I think you would be creating a horrendous amount of
work
> for yourself (having considered the idea for 18 months or so myself). IMHO
> time would be far better spent writing an OLEDB provider for PostgreSQL (a
> native one, not one using the Simple Provider interface). At least then
you
> can still manipulate data in recordset objects which aren't really that
bad
> to work with and are very useful when you attach them to a hidden data
> control so you can bind other controls to them.
>
> Regards,
> Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Lang | 2000-11-01 16:36:56 | Re: Connecting remotely. |
Previous Message | kovacsz | 2000-11-01 16:32:08 | Re: RE: new maintainer for the ODBC driver? |