Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Date: 2018-01-08 20:28:55
Message-ID: 01387f5d-a95b-d159-becb-cf9ff9ba4e41@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/08/2018 08:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I
>> posted initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining
>> issues he pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already
>> looking into that. Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon,
>> or should I?
>
> No, I thought you were going to run with those ideas. I have a lot
> of other stuff on my plate ...
>

OK, will do.

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-01-08 20:30:33 Re: update portal-related memory context names and API
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-01-08 20:27:56 Re: portal pinning