| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Robert Bernier" <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #2560: Web page documentation hard |
| Date: | 2006-08-02 20:39:57 |
| Message-ID: | 013101c6b673$bbad9700$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----Original Message-----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: "Robert Bernier" <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>; "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: 02/08/06 20:30
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #2560: Web page documentation hard
> But what strikes me is the idea of teaching the search engine not to
> ignore stopwords that are marked as <indexterm>'s ...
We tell it what to ignore, not the other way round. Besides, the problem as I understood it was that a search for 'IN' returns virtually every page (as one might expect) which is little help when looking for IN the keyword.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-02 20:43:09 | Re: [Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #2560: Web page documentation hard |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-02 19:29:33 | Re: [Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #2560: Web page documentation hard |