Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose

From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
To: "Eric Yum" <eric(dot)yum(at)ck-lifesciences(dot)com>,<pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: License for PostgreSQL for commercial purpose
Date: 2004-03-28 11:25:54
Message-ID: 012c01c414b7$70424b20$24e0a8c0@sonylaptop (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Eric Yum wrote:

You should get your local legal professional to give an opinion if you
intend to redistribute. One specific area of contention amongst "BSD
license" people is the phrase:

"... for any purpose, without fee, and ..."

Some opine that this means the software in question can *only* be
distributed without charging a fee, whilst other have claimed that this
(should) be read as "... for any purpose, with or without fee, and ...",
perhaps dropping the ", without fee" altogether to retain its potentially
originally intended meaning.

The problem is that intent is never simple to convey in legal terms. Until
this is tested in court, you can only get opinions.

PS I am waving my opinion over BSD style licenses in general and not just
the PostgreSQL project. Each copyright owner can choose to do whatever they


In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-28 15:28:59
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf file and logging questions
Previous:From: adminDate: 2004-03-28 01:32:37
Subject: postgresql.conf file and logging questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group