Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642

From: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and SmartArray 642
Date: 2006-08-08 12:20:22
Message-ID: 012F5F4F-929E-4A54-B68C-D2736D2A4EFA@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Aug 5, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Steve Poe wrote:
>
> Has anyone worked with server before. I've read the SmartArray 6i is a
> poor performer, I wonder if the SmartArray 642 adapter would have the
> same fate?
>

My newest db is a DL385, 6 disks. It runs very nicely. I have no
issues with the 6i controller.
If you look in the pgsql-performance archives a week or two ago
you'll see a similar thread to
this one - in fact, it is also about a dl385 (but he had a 5i
controller)

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Poe 2006-08-08 13:57:10 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2006-08-08 12:20:01 Re: shared_buffer optimization