Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Date: 2005-06-28 20:48:56
Message-ID: 012801c57c22$cdcfff20$0f01a8c0@zaphod
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:24:19PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> I *think* that's easy enough to do in time for 8.1. Trivial patch
>> attached. I hope it's enough :-) It passed my very quick testing...
>>
>> (Yup, I read the mails aobut PGCLIENTENCODING, but an option to pg_dump
>> is certainly easier)
>
> You forgot to document the long option, I think.

Are the man pages generated from the sgml docs? Have never had a look at
that.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-28 20:51:39 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-28 20:43:17 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-28 20:51:39 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-28 20:43:17 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump