From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/src/backend/utils/cache relcache.c |
Date: | 2002-05-22 17:51:33 |
Message-ID: | 011101c201b9$4f9d94a0$9865fea9@Allan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Ummm out of interest, where is this bug database where each bug has a number
(eg. #671)?
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/utils/cache relcache.c
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot
> Module name: pgsql
> Changes by: tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org 02/05/22 11:57:40
>
> Modified files:
> src/backend/utils/cache: relcache.c
>
> Log message:
> Make RelationForgetRelation error out if the relcache entry has nonzero
> reference count. This avoids leaving dangling pointers around, as in
> recent bug report against sequences (bug# 671).
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-22 18:24:48 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/utils/cache relcache.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-22 17:29:45 | pgsql/src/backend/utils/cache Tag: REL7_2_STAB ... |