| From: | Horst Herb <hherb(at)malleenet(dot)net(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Arsalan Zaidi" <azaidi(at)directi(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 90 million rows in one table... |
| Date: | 2001-09-20 11:41:34 |
| Message-ID: | 0109202141341K.01860@munin.gnumed.dhs.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Thursday 20 September 2001 17:35, you wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're writing an application which is going to create a table with around
> 90 million rows...
>
> Has anyone done something like this with PostgreSQL? Will the DB run, or
> will it choke..
>
>
> In addition, what kind of effect does turning multi-byte support have on
> database stability and speed? Any repercussions at all?
Why don't you just try? Create a dummy data base, dummy table and fill it
with dummy data to get some real life timings on your own hardware. Wouldn't
take more than one afternoon to do a little bit of testing
Horst
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Allan Engelhardt | 2001-09-20 12:41:47 | Re: 90 million rows in one table... |
| Previous Message | Arsalan Zaidi | 2001-09-20 07:35:51 | 90 million rows in one table... |