Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)

From: Janning Vygen <vygen(at)planwerk6(dot)de>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)
Date: 2001-07-18 15:00:51
Message-ID: 01071817005105.32508@janning
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 16:36 schrieb Thomas Lockhart:
> > this way i have to implement my businees logic twice. inside the
> > database and in the middleware. I dont think that this is very
> > good.
>
> Hmm. Sounds like you are writing both the DB and the app. So
> enforcing *your* business rules in the DB is not so important to
> you because you are trusting yourself to do the same in the app.
> But for cases where the project outgrows one programmer, or where
> there are multiple apps touching the *same* DB, isolating the
> business rules - into the one place in common between these apps -
> becomes a more obvious choice.

What do you mean with "isolating the business rules - into the one
place in common between these apps"

what is the place _between_ these apps? Do you mean the middleware?
or do you mean, that businnes rules are at one place and are then
parsed into middleware and database from the same source?? This would
be a great tool. Do you know one?

janning

--
Planwerk 6 /websolutions
Herzogstrae 86
40215 Dsseldorf

fon 0211-6015919
fax 0211-6015917
http://www.planwerk6.de

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith F Irwin 2001-07-18 15:07:15 Ping?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-07-18 14:36:33 Re: Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)