Re: Performance aggregates

From: snpe <snpe(at)infosky(dot)net>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance aggregates
Date: 2001-05-15 19:00:02
Message-ID: 01051521000204.01497@spnew
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 15 May 2001 17:28, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, snpe wrote:
> > Table e_kalkn have 4668 rows and e_kalkns 101170 rows.
> >
> > Query :
> >
> > select roba,sum(izn)
> > from e_kalkn k,e_kalkns ks
> > where k.id=ks.id
> > group by roba
> > order by roba
> >
> > is 2.5 times faster on one commercial database (there are tests on
> > Internet that say 'Postgresql is faster than that database).
> > I can't say which database it is.
>
> Have you run vacuum analyze (since loading the data) and what does explain
> show for the query. Also, what version are you using?
>
version postgresql 7.1.1

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Wood 2001-05-15 19:02:00 Re: Re: Re: What's the best front end/client under MS Windows?
Previous Message snpe 2001-05-15 18:59:19 Re: Performance aggregates