Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql

From: Michelle Murrain <mpm(at)norwottuck(dot)com>
To: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d=29=2C=20mpm=40norwottuck=2Ecom?=)
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ryan Mahoney <ryan(at)paymentalliance(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql
Date: 2001-05-03 21:45:19
Message-ID: 01050317451900.01202@chicago.murrain.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 03 May 2001 04:48 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:

> Those others, like "stable" and "secure". "Enjoyable" is obviously
> subjective (FreeBSD isn't very enjoyable for me, who has used Linux
> and Solaris extensively and much prefer SysV to BSD).

OK, I'll buy that the post was a bit much - my point was just that
comparisons of flavors of UNIX seem, IMHO to be pointless, and flinging
accusations of FUD are even more pointless. You can make just about any
flavor of UNIX (unless it's under serious development, or seriously flawed)
about as stable and secure as any other. Unlike comparisons of very different
OSes (Windows vs Unix vs MacOS), comparisons of UNIX seem, to me, to come
down to personal preference. (Although, many would argue the same for the
other comparisons as well).

Let's save the FUD accusations for much more serious matters.

Michelle
--
------------
Michelle Murrain, Ph.D.
President
Norwottuck Technology Resources
mpm(at)norwottuck(dot)com
http://www.norwottuck.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lieven Van Acker 2001-05-03 21:47:00 Re: View permissions in 7.1
Previous Message Nils Zonneveld 2001-05-03 21:44:59 Re: MS-Query