From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. |
Date: | 2001-03-20 23:34:00 |
Message-ID: | 01032018373305.14753@lowen |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since no other backend should be trying to touch this temp table,
> there's something pretty fishy here.
I see.
> Given that this is a parallel test, you may be looking at a
> low-probability timing-dependent failure. I'd say set up the machine
> and run repeat tests for an hour or three ... that's what I plan to do
> here.
As a broadcast engineer, I'm a little too familiar with such things. But this
isn't an engineer list, so I'll spare you the war stories. :-)
> BTW, what postmaster parameters are you using --- -B and so forth?
Default. To be changed before RPM release, but currently it is the default.
The only option that postmaster.opts records is -D, and I'm not passing
anything else.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-20 23:36:53 | pgindent run? |
Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-03-20 23:25:24 | RE: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. |