Re: why the need for is null?

From: "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why the need for is null?
Date: 2004-01-03 12:30:17
Message-ID: 010201c3d1f5$5cf775e0$1800053d@winxp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Don't mentioning the fact that for Oracle a zero length string is NULL!
> Isn't that funny ?

All I can say is wow.

Finally a good *technical* reason not to use Oracle!

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-01-03 14:49:32 Re: website doc search is extremely SLOW
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-01-03 11:08:48 Re: why the need for is null?