Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: "'Dean Rasheed'" <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Date: 2012-09-24 11:10:26
Message-ID: 00d901cd9a45$33d59a30$9b80ce90$@kapila@huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday, September 23, 2012 12:33 AM Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 18 September 2012 14:23, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> > Please find the review of the patch.
> >
>
> Thanks for the review. Attached is an updated patch, and I've include
> some responses to specific review comments below.

I have verified your updated patch. It works fine and according to me it is
ready for committer to check this patch.
I have updated in CF page as Ready for Committer.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-09-24 11:27:54 DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-09-24 10:57:02 Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation