Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres bug (working with iserverd)

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alexandr" <AVShutko(at)mail(dot)khstu(dot)ru>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres bug (working with iserverd)
Date: 2001-05-15 06:57:58
Message-ID: 00c301c0dd0c$69ef2440$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
> > How subselects run queries again and again?
> They don't end and restart them; they just rescan them.  If we had

Thanks for recollection.

> this substitute-a-new-tuple hack integrated into the Param mechanism,
> then EvalPlanQual could use ExecReScan too, but at the moment no...

I see.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oliver SeidelDate: 2001-05-15 07:05:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Internet is putting lot of competition fire & heat under Microsoft SQL Server
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2001-05-15 06:19:01
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-15 13:52:16
Subject: Re: Segfault in pgsql, Sparc Solaris 2.7, Postgresql 7.1.1
Previous:From: Paul McGarryDate: 2001-05-15 06:47:30
Subject: RE: Segfault in pgsql, Sparc Solaris 2.7, Postgresql 7.1.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group